Can a pulmonary embolism be detected by an X-ray?

Written by An Yong Peng
Pulmonology
Updated on February 11, 2025
00:00
00:00

Pulmonary embolism cannot be detected by X-ray. Although in rare cases, some signs might appear on an X-ray, such as localized sparse lung markings, these signs are typically not characteristic. For conditions like pulmonary embolism, color Doppler ultrasound can be used to assist in diagnosis. If the ultrasound suggests deep vein thrombosis in the legs along with pulmonary hypertension, it indicates a high possibility of pulmonary embolism. Additionally, testing for D-dimer and blood gas analysis can also help in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. CT pulmonary angiography can also be used to diagnose the condition. CT and pulmonary angiography have a high diagnostic value for pulmonary embolism, and most cases can be definitively diagnosed through these tests.

Other Voices

doctor image
home-news-image
Written by Wang Chun Mei
Pulmonology
51sec home-news-image

Why can't patients with pulmonary embolism get out of bed?

Pulmonary embolism is a relatively common clinical disease, with many and complex inducing factors. The most common cause of pulmonary embolism in patients is due primarily to thrombi dislodging from the veins of the lower limbs or the pelvic deep veins, traveling through the bloodstream to the pulmonary arteries, thus causing the disease. Therefore, bed rest is essential during the acute phase of pulmonary embolism. The purpose of bed rest is to prevent further embolisms, to avoid the dislodging of pelvic or lower limb deep vein thrombi, which could lead to the formation of new thrombi. Therefore, for patients with pulmonary embolism, it is crucial to provide timely treatments such as thrombolysis to control the clinical symptoms caused by the pulmonary embolism effectively.

doctor image
home-news-image
Written by Yuan Qing
Pulmonology
56sec home-news-image

Can a secondary recurrence of pulmonary embolism be treated?

Pulmonary embolism, even if it recurs for the second time, is treatable, but the approach should differ from the first recurrence. It's vital to determine the cause of the pulmonary embolism, although many patients with this condition do not have an identifiable cause. For such patients, long-term oral anticoagulants might be recommended. With long-term use of oral anticoagulants, the likelihood of thrombosis, especially in the venous system, significantly reduces. This means that the chance of recurrence in patients also decreases considerably. However, if the cause can be identified, it is better to address and eliminate it. For instance, if the cause is long-term use of oral contraceptives or the presence of varicose veins, these primary or secondary factors should be resolved. The treatment should not just focus on anticoagulation or thrombolytic therapy, as there could still be a possibility of a future pulmonary embolism recurrence.

doctor image
home-news-image
Written by Wang Chun Mei
Pulmonology
1min 9sec home-news-image

Will acute pulmonary embolism get better in two days?

Acute pulmonary embolism is a type of disease with very many and complex inducing factors. Clinically, acute pulmonary embolism has a very sudden onset, and patients often present with unexplained symptoms such as pale complexion, chest tightness, chest pain, and difficulty breathing. During the acute phase of pulmonary embolism, immediate and effective anti-shock and other symptomatic resuscitation are essential upon arrival at the hospital. Generally, after timely and effective resuscitation, the patient's condition may be somewhat controlled. Usually, the first 1-3 days after the onset of pulmonary embolism are the most dangerous; therefore, continuous monitoring of the patient's vital signs is crucial during this time, followed by anti-shock and anticoagulation treatment as needed. Therefore, acute pulmonary embolism will not improve by the second day, although some of the patient's clinical symptoms may slightly improve after treatment.

doctor image
home-news-image
Written by Yuan Qing
Pulmonology
1min 4sec home-news-image

Can acute pulmonary embolism be cured by anticoagulation?

Anticoagulation has a partial curative effect on acute pulmonary embolism. Based on the area of the embolism and the patient's vital signs, it is classified into mild, moderate, and severe pulmonary embolism. If it is a mild to moderate pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation can completely cure it, because anticoagulation can help the body's fibrinolytic system remove the blood clots that have already formed, and it can also prevent new clots from forming. However, in cases of severe pulmonary embolism, especially when the patient presents unstable vital signs and is in life-threatening condition, it is not advisable to rely solely on anticoagulant therapy. This is because the effect of anticoagulant treatment is relatively slow, and it requires a certain amount of time for the body's immune and fibrinolytic systems to clear the embolism. Therefore, at such times, thrombolytic treatment is recommended. Of course, this requires an experienced physician to assess the patient's vital signs and overall condition.

doctor image
home-news-image
Written by Wang Li Bing
Intensive Care Medicine Department
45sec home-news-image

What are the symptoms of a pulmonary embolism warning sign?

Pulmonary embolism is also very common in clinical settings, mainly seen in patients who have been bedridden for a long time, undergone various major surgeries, suffered from long bone fractures, pregnancy, etc. In the early stages of pulmonary embolism, patients generally experience varying degrees of chest pain, hemoptysis, and difficulty breathing, among others. If pulmonary embolism is suspected and the patient's condition permits, a pulmonary artery CTA scan should be immediately carried out to further confirm the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. If the pulmonary embolism has already caused circulatory disturbances, thrombolytic therapy should then be considered.